As I read back through more and more news articles about the Zain Dean case, I have an overpowering sense of deja vu. The often-times inappropriate, prejudicial and heavy-handed ways Dean's case was handled by the courts, the prosecutor's office, the media, plus the Taiwan public's insatiable appetite to see a foreigner convicted and jailed, has been reminiscent of the way my own case was little more than exercise in style over substance - a comical show put on to give the appearance of due process and true justice that in reality are nearly as elusive in Taiwan as they are in it's close neighbor China.
On paper and in it's propaganda, Taiwan's judiciary professes to adhere to due process and the Rule of Law, but in practice due process is subservient to the personal views, biases, connections and loyalty to certain patrons of too many judges. If you've ever spent enough time in a Taiwan court (or prosecutor's room), Rule of Law in actuality is Rule of the Judge-God - omnipotent, all-powerful, beyond all reproach...an additional adversary to overcome in an innocent person's quest for appropriate justice.
Although I was the plaintiff in my case against the National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, the succession of judges in Taipei District Court treated me virtually the same way Zain Dean alleges he was treated as the defendant in his vehicular murder case. The similarities and parallels in how our cases were (mis)handled and manipulated by the courts and other involved parties are numerous and indicative of a long-running and endemic deficiency in Taiwan's judiciary, particularly when cases involve foreign nationals.
As evidenced by the Zain Dean case, a very bad beat continues to go on with no positive change in sight. Taiwan's judiciary has many flaws that have been debated for years by critics and the government alike, but very little tangible improvement has been seen. In fact, it appears that the situation may be growing worse and the future looks bleak especially for any expat in Taiwan unfortunate enough to become involved in a legal case.
Here is another recent article about the Zain Dean case and a Taiwan TV news story in which Dean again proclaims his innocence:
Girlfriend of UK fugitive detained
Zain Dean calls reporters to proclaim his innocence
On paper and in it's propaganda, Taiwan's judiciary professes to adhere to due process and the Rule of Law, but in practice due process is subservient to the personal views, biases, connections and loyalty to certain patrons of too many judges. If you've ever spent enough time in a Taiwan court (or prosecutor's room), Rule of Law in actuality is Rule of the Judge-God - omnipotent, all-powerful, beyond all reproach...an additional adversary to overcome in an innocent person's quest for appropriate justice.
Although I was the plaintiff in my case against the National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, the succession of judges in Taipei District Court treated me virtually the same way Zain Dean alleges he was treated as the defendant in his vehicular murder case. The similarities and parallels in how our cases were (mis)handled and manipulated by the courts and other involved parties are numerous and indicative of a long-running and endemic deficiency in Taiwan's judiciary, particularly when cases involve foreign nationals.
As evidenced by the Zain Dean case, a very bad beat continues to go on with no positive change in sight. Taiwan's judiciary has many flaws that have been debated for years by critics and the government alike, but very little tangible improvement has been seen. In fact, it appears that the situation may be growing worse and the future looks bleak especially for any expat in Taiwan unfortunate enough to become involved in a legal case.
Here is another recent article about the Zain Dean case and a Taiwan TV news story in which Dean again proclaims his innocence:
Girlfriend of UK fugitive detained
Zain Dean calls reporters to proclaim his innocence
