There were stories in several Chinese-language tabloids and one that I found in the English-language China Post newspaper:
Updated Friday, April 29, 2011
11:49 pm TWN, The China Post news staff
Court
rejects teacher's claim of lost reputation
Taipei
District Court has rejected the claim filed by a foreign teacher of a
university in Taipei for reputation damage. The teacher was fired because of
sexual harassment allegation.
The
teacher filed a lawsuit against the school for the harassment accusation with a
claim totaling over NT$700,000, including one-year salary and NT$100,000 moral
damage compensation. In addition, he demanded that the university publish an
apology for its layoff decision.
He
said that the sexual harassment charge was groundless as the girl who accused
him neither screamed nor reported his move to the police.
The
decision of his dismissal and disclosure of the grievance case to the teacher
grievances committee were not appropriate, he added.
The
girl was said to have felt “disturbed and afraid” by the teacher's
inappropriate conduct. She first brought up her experience to counselor in the
campus. The director of her department later reported the case to the teacher
grievances committee, which decided that the teacher had to go.
According
to the court ruling released yesterday, several witnesses saw the teacher
embrace the female student's waist and whisper in her ear in a school event.
The teacher lost his case because the decision of the teacher grievances
committee was valid and the school disclosure of the harassment investigation
did not break the law.
The
teacher can file an appeal against the ruling, said the court.
(I attempted to post this response
to the story on the Taipei Times website, but mysteriously and inexplicably the
paper refused to publish it. Another glaring example of how Taiwan’s media + government has
increasingly been controlling news and stifling the truth and the public’s
right to dispute inaccuracies and fabrications in news stories.)
I
am the American teacher featured in this poorly written and inaccurate story.
As
one example of your inaccurate information, there were not "several"
witnesses who saw me touch anyone. Instead, there were 5 witnesses who saw
NOTHING happen and 1 so-called 'witness' who changed the time and place
multiple times in a perjurous attempt to help the school and the accuser.
If you want to get your facts straight and write a
real, well-written story, please contact me at jugger3naut@live.comYou can read more about my thoughts about the China Post story and the false accusation in my May 1, 2011 blog entry. In reviewing the post, I found that almost all the links I included to stories in Taiwan's Chinese-language media were expired. I'll be posting the stories instead of just the links in my next post.
No comments:
Post a Comment